Earlier this year we saw a flurry of 200MW and 300MW announcements followed eventually by the eye-popping 2GW Chinese project from FirstSolar. The message many seemed to be taking away is that “bigger is better” when it comes to solar. However, while the world desperately needs more renewables, there is a growing chorus of concern about these large-scale projects in terms of land use, water requirements, and the 5+ years timeframes associated with bringing these projects online.
One of the things that makes Recurrent Energy unique is our focus on distributed-scale projects—our vision is to build a fleet of 2MW-20MW solar photovoltaic (PV) power plants connected directly to the existing distribution grid.
Distributed scale projects enjoy important advantages over large-scale projects--they're less complex, faster to interconnect and they bypass time-consuming land-use issues that often add years to project timelines. In short, distributed PV projects benefit from:
- Easier to site - Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is clean and quiet, which means it can be sited on or near occupied buildings. Plus solar PV is highly modular, making it easy to adapt to site conditions and scalable to existing transmission capacity.
- Faster to interconnect - A distributed solar project can be scaled to meet the capacity that already exists on the grid. And projects under 20MW in size are fastracked via the Small Generator Interconnection Protocol (SGIP). The result is that distributed scale projects go through a quicker review and are less likely to encounter delays waiting for lengthy transmission system upgrades.
- Less environmentally sensitive land use - Unlike large-scale solar, distributed-scale projects don't need thousands of acres of pristine wilderness. Instead, distributed scale projects can be sited on previously disturbed lands and large industrial rooftops (see our Spain announcement). That means they get through land use approvals and permitting faster.
As a result of these advantages, Recurrent Energy can deliver projects in as little as 1 to 2 years versus the 5 or more years typically associated with larger scale developments. Bottom line, we can deliver the benefits of solar sooner to customers, the environment, and our investors when compared to large-scale solar.
What’s great about the approach we’re taking is that it’s both a great environmental strategy and a sound business strategy. And while our individual solar projects are smaller than large-scale projects, our pipeline of over 1000MW across North America and Europe demonstrates that our strategy can still deliver large volumes.
I respectfully disagree on some points and agree on others.
There isn't any need for these large utility scale projects and what will we do with all the additional energy? Solar Direct Steam Generation technology such as Ausra and PowerSmith Group's can be installed on existing fossil power stations as a hybrid and reduce the consumption of fossil fuels. The real reason these mega solar projects all boils down to quick millions in profits to relatively few.
Posted by: Robert Emery | 24 December 2009 at 02:36 PM
Solar Energy is the most easily available and free source of energy. It is the most important out of non-conventional sources of energy too, it is non polluting, available for all and convenient source therefore helps in lessening the greenhouse effect.
Posted by: solar heating systems | 24 November 2010 at 11:19 PM
Hi, thanks for this post, it was very informative. Though you lack some information about the growing concerns about large scale project. When you say "the bigger the better" its also implies that the price is way higher than a regular family can do. For people who wants to enjoy and benefit from the many solar energy advantages, a small scale project such as solar hot water heater is very nice.
Posted by: Lana Madison | 04 January 2011 at 07:05 PM
Thanks for this post, it's really interesting and informative but there are also somethings that I also do not agree on like when you said the bigger the better I agree to what Lana Madison said it will be unfair for some familes who will not be able to enjoy the benefits of solar energy.
We all know that there are so many solar energy advantages like on this site below;
http://www.buildsolar.net/solar-energy/about-solar-energy-advantages-our-reliable-facts/
so it would be really sad if the other families won't be ablt to afford it.
Posted by: Jace Low | 09 January 2011 at 10:42 PM